545679 Bifunctional Catalysts for Selective Conversion of Syngas beyond Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis

Thursday, June 6, 2019: 11:09 AM
Texas Ballroom A (Grand Hyatt San Antonio)
J. Lennart Weber1, Daniel Martinez2, Carmen Martos2, Arturo Vizcaino2, Petra E. de Jongh1 and Krijn de Jong1, (1)Inorganic Chemistry and Catalysis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands, (2)University Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain

Conversion of Synthesis Gas to Aromatics using Bifunctional Catalysis

J. Lennart Weber1, Daniel Martinez2, Carmen Martos2, Arturo Vizcaino2, Petra E. de Jongh1, Krijn P. de Jong1 1 Inorganic Chemistry and Catalysis, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

2 Department of Energy and Chemical Technology, University Rey Juan Carlos, Campus de Móstoles, Spain.

The production of materials such as plastics, as well as platform chemicals such as olefins and aromatics is mainly based on processing of crude oil. In order to reduce the carbon footprint alternative pathways are needed. Synthesis gas (a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen) can be derived from carbon containing feedstocks such as natural gas, coal and biomass and therefore offers a potentially more sustainable pathway for the production of chemicals and fuels. The Fischer-Tropsch synthesis allows to convert synthesis gas to hydrocarbons with a wide range of chain length varying from methane to heavy waxes with more than 30 carbon atoms. These Fischer-Tropsch products can be further processed to diesel, gasoline, olefins or waxes with very high purity. Alternatively, synthesis gas can be converted to methanol, which can be further processed to olefins and other hydrocarbons or dimethyl ether.

In the past years the conversion of synthesis gas to chemicals using bifunctional catalysts has received great attention. The combination of a metal oxide and a zeolite into a bifunctional catalyst allows to convert synthesis gas to short olefins such as ethylene [1] or aromatics [2] with selectivities as high as 80% with oxygenates as intermediates. The catalyst bed design plays an important role for the product distribution and activity of these bifunctional catalysts [3]. Alternatively, synthesis gas can be converted into C2-C4 olefins with high selectivity of 63% using the Fischer-Tropsch to olefins (FTO) process. Adding sodium and sulfur promoters to an iron (-carbide) based catalyst suppresses methane formation and increases activity compared to an unpromoted catalyst [4,5]. Such an FTO catalyst can be combined with an H-ZSM-5 zeolite to convert the olefins into aromatics at ~400 C and 1 bar pressure [6]. To reach more industrially relevant conditions, a medium temperature and high pressure process is required. Here, we show a process to convert synthesis gas to aromatics operating at temperatures between 250 °C and 300 °C and 20 bar pressure forming olefins in the C4-C8 range as intermediates report the impact of temperature and zeolite content in the catalyst on the formation and distribution of aromatic products.

We prepared a bulk iron catalyst (surface area 40 m²/g, pore volume 0.3 mL/g) by precipitation from a 0.1 mol/L iron nitrate solution with ammonia solution. After washing, drying at 120 °C and calcination at 300 °C in static air, the resulting iron oxide was impregnated with a potassium nitrate solution to achieve a mass ratio of iron to potassium of 100Fe:3K (denoted as FeK). This potassium promoted bulk iron catalyst was combined with an H-ZSM-5 zeolite (Si:Al = 15 at/at) in a stacked bed configuration with ratios of zeolite to FeK between 0.5 m/m and 4 m/m and tested in a 16-channel high throughput fixed bed unit (Flowrence, Avantium) under medium alpha conditions (alpha of 0.67 at 250 °C and alpha of 0.60 at 300 °C). After reduction at 350 °C for 2 h in 30 % H2 in N2 at 1 bar, synthesis gas was introduced at temperatures between 250 °C and 300 °C at 20 bar pressure. Here, we show the influence of temperature and zeolite to FeK ratio in stacked bed mode on the formation of aromatics and distribution within the aromatic fraction.

The initial activity normalized to the mass of iron (iron time yield, FTY) was found to be around 5.7 10-5molCO gFe-1 s-1 for all experiments performed at 300 °C and decreased to a stable FTY of 2.2 10-5molCO gFe-1 s-1 after 40 h on stream, whereas the experiments performed at 250 °C stabilized at an activity of 0.9 10-5molCO gFe-1 s-1 and at 275 °C at an FTY of 1.1 10-5molCO gFe-1 s-1. Further, we found that the selectivity to C6-C10 aromatics increased with increasing reaction temperature operating at a zeolite to FeK ratio of 2 m/m. In stacked bed mode, selectivity to C6-C10 aromatics of 2.3 %C at 250 °C, 2.8 %C at 275 °C and 4.1 %C at 300 °C were observed. Furthermore, a shift to heavier aromatic products was noticed with on average 7.9 carbon atoms at 250 °C to 8.3 carbon atoms at 300 °C within the aromatics distribution. The potassium promoted bulk iron catalyst without zeolite showed a selectivity to C2-C3 olefins of 21 %C and to C4-C8 olefins of 30 %C at 300 °C and no aromatics were formed (see Figure - top). With increasing the zeolite to FeK ratio between 0.5 m/m and 1.5 m/m C4-C8 olefins selectivity decreased from initially 30 %C to 18-21 %C, whereas the selectivity to C2-C3 olefins remained constant between 20 %C and 21 %C. C6-C10 aromatics were formed with 4-6 %C selectivity (87 % xylenes in C8 aromatics) and an average carbon number of 8.1 at at a zeolite to FeK ratio of 1 m/m. Increasing the zeolite to FeK ratio to 2 m/m led to the decrease in C2-C3 olefins selectivity to 7 %C and the formation of heavier aromatics with an average carbon number of 8.3 at. A further increase in zeolite to FeK ratio to 2.5 m/m led to the formation of C6-C8 aromatics with 19 %C selectivity, whereas the selectivity towards both C2-C3 olefins and C4-C8 olefins decreased. At a high zeolite to FeK ratio of 4 m/m we observed a selectivity to C6-C10 aromatics of 21 %C and almost no olefins were formed. These results show that C8-aromatics were formed preferentially from longer C4-C8 olefins when a low amount of zeolite was present (zeolite to FeK ratio between 0.5 m/m and 1.5 m/m). Increasing the amount of zeolite led to alkylation of light aromatics such as toluene with ethylene as well as oligomerization of C2-C3 olefins towards C4-C8 olefins, resulting in lower C2-C3 olefins selectivity and increased selectivity to aromatics with higher average carbon number. Operating with zeolite to FeK ratio of 4 m/m the catalytic data suggested the aromatization of shorter olefins to form aromatics. In contrast to a high temperature and low pressure process the aromatization followed a hydrogen transfer pathway, forming paraffins as side product (data not shown).

We show that combining a potassium promoted bulk iron catalyst with an H-ZSM-5 zeolite in a stacked-bed enabled a medium temperature route to convert synthesis gas to olefins and aromatics with adjustable product composition depending on reaction temperature and catalyst composition. The CO conversion of this medium temperature process is scalable by changing space velocity (CO conversion as high as 87 % and 62 % aromatics in the liquid C5+ fraction, detailed data will be shown at the conference). This demonstrates an advantage over the processes using oxygenates intermediates to form aromatics, which seem to be limited to CO conversions of around 20 %. Furthermore, this medium temperature process shows a long lifetime of the catalysts compared to the high temperature process operating at 400 °C. These findings allow to design targeted bifunctional catalyst systems for various applications.

[1]      F. Jiao, X. Pan, K. Gong, Y. Chen, G. Li, X. Bao, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 4692–4696.

[2]      K. Cheng, W. Zhou, J. Kang, S. He, S. Shi, Q. Zhang, Y. Pan, W. Wen, Y. Wang, Chem 3 (2017) 334–347.

[3]      W. Zhou, J. Kang, K. Cheng, S. He, J. Shi, C. Zhou, Q. Zhang, J. Chen, L. Peng, M. Chen, Y. Wang, Angew. Chemie Internatioanl Ed. (2018) 10.1002/anie.201807113.

[4]      H.M. Torres Galvis, J.H. Bitter, C.B. Khare, M. Ruitenbeek, A.I. Dugulan, K.P. De Jong, Science 335 (2012) 835–838.

[5]      M. Oschatz, T.W. van Deelen, J.L. Weber, W.S. Lamme, G. Wang, B. Goderis, O. Verkinderen, A.I. Dugulan, K.P. de Jong, Catal. Sci. Technol. 6 (2016) 8464–8473.

[6]      J.L. Weber, I. Dugulan, P.E. de Jongh, K.P. de Jong, ChemCatChem 10 (2018) 1107–1112.


Extended Abstract: File Not Uploaded