Zeolites are microporous aluminosilicates and their crystal lattice is based on the SiO44- tetrahedron. The net negative charge due to substitution of Si4+ with Al3+ allows to host a number of elements in extra-framework positions. Nevertheless, Al-free zeotypes can be synthesized with elements other than Al in framework positions 5. In 2012, Hammond et al. obtained remarkable CH4 conversion and selectivity towards CH3OH using a mixture of Al-free zeotypes as catalysts and liquid H2O2 as oxidant. In particular, the catalysts consisted of Fe and Cu containing silicalite, the Al-free parent of the commercial ZSM-5 zeolite with MFI type of framework structure. Fe and Cu were added prior to and post crystallization, respectively, resulting in framework and extra-framework metal species 6. The lower acidity of the Fe-silicalite zeotype compared to Fe-exchanged ZSM-5 zeolite is believed to facilitate CH3OH desorption due to the higher hydrophobicity of the Al-free zeotype.
This study aims to give a fundamental understanding of metal containing zeotypes with MFI type of framework structure suitable for the direct conversion of methane to methanol. The zeotypes are hydrothermally synthesized and characterized with diffraction, physisorption and spectroscopy techniques. Furthermore, the tendency of CH3OH to desorb from the internal surfaces of the catalyst is detected by temperature programmed desorption of methanol, CH3OH TPD, and the evolution of surface species is followed using DRIFTS. In a standard synthesis procedure, the silica precursor is mixed with the structure directing agent, SDA, and the metal precursor in aqueous medium. The so obtained gel is crystallized in autoclave and the products are washed, filtered and dried. The SDA is then removed by calcination and the H+-form of the zeotype is obtained by ammonium exchange and further calcination. The MFI type of framework structure is confirmed by PXRD and more insights about the incorporation of metals in the framework are given by N2 physisorption and IR spectroscopy.
- Čejka, G. Centi, J. Perez-Pariente and J.W. Roth, Catalysis Today, 179 (2012), 2-15.
- Taifan, W. & Baltrusaitis, J. CH4 conversion to value added products: Potential, limitations and extensions of a single step heterogeneous catalysis. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 198, 525–547 (2016).
- Zakaria & Kamarudin. Direct conversion technologies of methane to methanol: An overview. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 65, 250–261 (2016).
- Kondratenko, E. V. et al. Methane conversion into different hydrocarbons or oxygenates: current status and future perspectives in catalyst development and reactor operation. Catal. Sci. Technol. 7, 366–381 (2017).
- Elaine, L. E. S. & A.Moore, E. SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY: An Introduction. Taylor & Francis Group (2005).
- Hammond, C. et al. Direct catalytic conversion of methane to methanol in an aqueous medium by using copper-promoted Fe-ZSM-5. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 51, (2012).
