597239 A Kinetic Study of Plasma-Assisted Ammonia Synthesis with Ru/γ-Al2O3

Friday, November 20, 2020
Catalysis and Reaction Engineering Division (20) (Poster Gallery)
Zhe Chen, Bruce E. Koel and Sankaran Sundaresan, Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ

Ammonia production from nitrogen and hydrogen via the Haber-Bosch process uses a thermal catalytic reactor which operates at high temperature (673-773 K) and high pressure (300 bar), consuming almost 2% of the world’s total energy supply [1]. Ammonia synthesis assisted by non-thermal plasmas has gained increasing attention because non-thermal plasmas allow ammonia synthesis to occur at atmospheric pressure and lower temperatures compared to thermal catalytic reactions [1].

Plasma-assisted ammonia synthesis is typically studied in dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) reactors with catalysts packed in the discharge zone [2, 3]. Metal nanoparticles contained in the catalysts can affect the reaction rates by (a) altering the plasma characteristics, and/or (b) providing catalytic sites for the excited species in the plasma to adsorb and react. In efforts to elucidate the mechanism by which the presence of Ru on γ-Al2O3 affects the reaction rates, we have performed a series of kinetic experiments at different plasma power levels and flow rates, with γ-Al2O3, 5 wt% Cu/γ-Al2O3 or 5 wt% Ru/γ-Al2O3, and have estimated ammonia decomposition and synthesis rates (the latter defined as the sum of ammonia observed and decomposition rates) from these experiments. Ru/γ-Al2O3 gives higher ammonia decomposition and synthesis rates than γ-Al2O3 and Cu/γ-Al2O3, indicating that Ru has a catalytic effect on both the forward and the reverse reactions. However, when these two catalytic effects are combined, the ammonia observed rate is promoted only by a slight amount in the presence of Ru/γ-Al2O3, suggesting that the overall benefit of using Ru/γ-Al2O3 over plain γ-Al2O3 may not be significant.

References

[1] Bogaerts, A., & Neyts, E. C., ACS Energy Lett., 3(4), 1013-1027 (2018).

[2] Kim, H. H. et al., Plasma Process. Polym., 14(6), 1600157 (2017).

[3] Mehta, P., et al., Nat. Catal., 1(4), 269-275 (2018).


Extended Abstract: File Not Uploaded