459124 Safety-Based Model Predictive Control with Data-Based Determination of Safety Level Sets

Thursday, November 17, 2016: 5:03 PM
Monterey II (Hotel Nikko San Francisco)
Fahad Albalawi1, Helen Durand2, Anas Alanqar2 and Panagiotis D. Christofides3, (1)Electrical Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, (2)Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, (3)Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and Department of Electrical Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

Maintaining safety of chemical processes is the most important operating objective in the chemical process industries. As a result, industry has developed a number of qualitative and quantitative means for assessing the safety of a chemical process, such as hazards and operability (HAZOP) studies, fault trees, and what-if scenarios. Process safety is promoted by designing a process to be inherently safe based on the chemistry and physics of the process; after the process has been designed, process control can be added to improve process safety [1]. The integration of safety with control [2] was pursued in [3], in which several Lyapunov-based economic model predictive controller (LEMPC) [4] formulations were developed with safety constraints. The safety constraints were designed to drive the process state into a smaller region of operation termed the safety region when a safety logic unit predicted that a component or software failure was possible if process operation was not moved to this smaller region of operation.

In this work, we improve the practical application of the safety-based LEMPC method proposed in [4] by developing a safety-based controller formulation in the context of Lyapunov-based model predictive control (LMPC) with a quadratic objective function for consistency with the tracking model predictive control (MPC) formulation commonly used in the chemical process industries [5]. In addition, we develop a data-based method for both the LMPC and LEMPC cases for determining the probability that the closed-loop state will leave a given safety level set, and the distance from the level set that the process states may move before returning to the safety level set, due to process disturbances and sensor noise. The knowledge gained from this data-based method can then be used by the safety logic unit as it evaluates safe regions of operation to quantify the probability that, for a given safety level set, the closed-loop state may move far enough from the safety level set to enter a region that the safety logic unit has determined to be unsafe. Furthermore, this knowledge may cause the safety logic unit to select smaller safety level sets for process operation if the disturbances and noise are known to move the process state significantly. In addition, closed-loop simulations of a chemical process example showed that LMPC with safety-based constraints was able to drive the process state into a required safety region more quickly than tracking LMPC alone, showing that the proposed safety-based model predictive control formulation can enhance the safety of current chemical process systems.

[1] Crowl DA, Louvar JF. Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications, 3rded. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2011.

[2] Leveson NG, Stephanopoulos G. A system-theoretic, control-inspired view and approach to process safety. AIChE Journal. 2014;60:2-14.

[3] Albalawi F, Alanqar A, Durand H, Christofides PD. A feedback control framework for safe and economically-optimal operation of nonlinear processes. AIChE Journal. 2016; in press.

[4] Heidarinejad M, Liu J, Christofides PD. Economic model predictive control of nonlinear process systems using Lyapunov techniques. AIChE Journal. 2012;58:855-870.

[5] Qin SJ, Badgwell TA. A survey of industrial model predictive control technology. Control Engineering Practice. 2003;11:733-764.


Extended Abstract: File Not Uploaded
See more of this Session: Process Control Applications II
See more of this Group/Topical: Computing and Systems Technology Division