281155 The Role of Nitrate in the Formation of Atmospheric Nanoparticles: Insights From Ambient Measurements and Chemical Transport Models

Thursday, November 1, 2012: 9:50 AM
330 (Convention Center )
Lea Hildebrandt Ruiz1,2, James Smith2, Ilona Riipinen3, Kelley Barsanti4, Juliane Fry5, Taina Yli-Juuti6, Tuukka Petaja6, Markku Kulmala6 and Peter H. McMurry7, (1)Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, (2)Atmospheric Chemistry Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, (3)Stockholm University, Sweden, (4)Portland State University, Portland, OR, (5)Reed University, Portland, OR, (6)University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, (7)Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

Atmospheric nanoparticles affect climate – directly, by scattering or absorbing solar radiation and indirectly, by acting as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and thereby influencing the formation and properties of clouds [1]. These effects are highly complex; in fact, direct and indirect particle impacts are the dominant uncertainty in predicting anthropogenic radiative forcing and future climate [1, 2]. Nanoparticles also affect human health by, among others, damaging the respiratory and cardiovascular systems [3, 4]. Improving our understanding of atmospheric particles will allow us to better predict radiative forcing and future climate, and to develop better-informed policy actions aimed at mitigating atmospheric nanoparticle concentrations and their adverse health effects.

Nanoparticles can either be emitted directly into the atmosphere, or they can form from atmospheric vapors. Recent field observations and modeling studies have found that new particle formation (NPF) significantly impacts the concentrations of atmospheric nanoparticles [5, 6] and CCN [7, 8]. The formation of new particles consists of a complex set of processes including the production of nanometer-size clusters from gaseous vapors, the growth of these clusters, and the removal of growing clusters by coagulation with pre-existing particles [9-12] . While atmospheric new particle formation has been observed to take place almost everywhere [13, 14], significant gaps in our knowledge regarding this phenomenon still exist. The condensation of sulfuric acid (H2SO4) vapors appears to be involved in almost all NPF [15, 16]. However, there is abundant evidence that the early growth of particles involves much more than sulfuric acid [17-20].

We previously developed the Thermal Desorption Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometer (TDCIMS)[21], which can measure the chemical composition of 10-30 nm particles and thereby provides insights into the chemical species involved in early nanoparticle growth [19]. We have recently upgraded the TDCIMS with a high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometer by Tofwerk AG, which allows us to collect data at higher time and mass resolution. We report the first measurements with this upgraded instrument taken in Hyytiälä, Finland, in April 2011. The TDCIMS measurements show that nitrate is the dominant species in 10-30 nm particles, suggesting its importance in nanoparticle growth. The abundance of nitrate in the nanoparticles is consistent with other measurements taken at the site.

We developed a box model to better understand the species and processes involved in NPF, building upon the previously developed Dynamic Model for Aerosol Nucleation (DMAN) [22]. The model simulates nucleation, coagulation and condensation/evaporation for a population of particles consisting of multiple components. It uses the TwO-Moment Aerosol Sectional (TOMAS) algorithm [23], which simultaneously tracks the mass and number concentration in each size section. Using results from laboratory chamber experiments, we developed parameterizations for the role of organic nitrate compounds in NPF and added these parameterizations to the model.

We compare model results of the relative contributions of different components to nanoparticle growth to measurements in two very different environments: Hyytiälä, Finland, a relatively clean environment with high biogenic emissions and Atlanta, GA, a city with large anthropogenic influence but also high biogenic emissions.


1.   IPCC, Climate Change 2007 - The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC., 2007.

2.   Myhre, G., Consistency Between Satellite-Derived and Modeled Estimates of the Direct Aerosol Effect. Science, 2009. 325(5937): p. 187-190.

3.   Davidson, C.I., R.F. Phalen, and P.A. Solomon, Airborne particulate matter and human health: A review. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2005. 39(8): p. 737-749.

4.   Pope, C.A. and D.W. Dockery, Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: Lines that connect. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 2006. 56: p. 709-742.

5.   Spracklen, D.V., et al., The contribution of boundary layer nucleation events to total particle concentrations on regional and global scales. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2006. 6: p. 5631-5648.

6.   Zhang, Y., et al., A comparative study of nucleation parameterizations: 2. Three-dimensional model application and evaluation. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 2010. 115: D20213.

7.   Ghan, S.J., et al., A physically based estimate of radiative forcing by anthropogenic sulfate aerosol. Journal Of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 2001. 106(D6): p. 5279-5293.

8.   Spracklen, D.V., et al., Contribution of particle formation to global cloud condensation nuclei concentrations. Geophysical Research Letters, 2008. 35(6): L06808.

9.   McMurry, P.H., New Particle Formation in the Presence of an Aerosol: Rates, Time Scales and sub-0.01 µm Size Distributions. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1983. 95: p. 72-80.

10. McMurry, P.H., et al., A Criterion for New Particle Formation in  the Sulfur-Rich Atlanta Atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research - Atmospheres, 2005. 110: D22S02.

11. McMurry, P.H. and S.K. Friedlander, New particle formation in the presence of an aerosol. Atmospheric Environment, 1979. 13: p. 1635-1651.

12. Weber, R.J., et al., Measured atmospheric new particle formation rates: implications for nucleation mechanisms. Chem. Eng. Comm., 1996. 151: p. 53-64.

13. Kulmala, M. and V.M. Kerminen, On the formation and growth of atmospheric nanoparticles. Atmospheric Research, 2008. 90 (2-4): p. 132-150.

14. Kulmala, M., et al., Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2004. 35(2): p. 143-176.

15. Kuang, C., et al., Dependence of nucleation rates on sulfuric acid vapor concentration in diverse atmospheric locations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2008. 113: D10209.

16. Sipila, M., et al., The Role of Sulfuric Acid in Atmospheric Nucleation. Science, 2010. 327(5970): p. 1243-1246.

17. Weber, R.J., et al., Measurements of new particle formation and ultrafine particle growth rates at a clean continental site. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 1997. 102: p. 4375-4385.

18. Kuang, C., et al., An improved criterion for new particle formation in diverse atmospheric environments. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2010. 10: p. 1-12.

19. Smith, J.N., et al., Chemical composition of atmospheric nanoparticles formed from nucleation in Tecamac, Mexico: Evidence for an important role for organic species in nanoparticle growth Geophysical Research Letters, 2008. 35: L04808.

20. Smith, J.N., et al., Observations of aminium salts in atmospheric nanoparticles and possible climatic implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010. 107(15): p. 6634–6639.

21. Smith, J.N., et al., Atmospheric Measurements of Sub-20 nm Diameter Particle Chemical Composition by Thermal Desorption Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2004. 38: p. 100-110.

22. Jung, J., P.J. Adams, and S.N. Pandis, Simulating the Size Distribution and Chemical Composition of Ultrafine Particles During Nucleation Events. Atmospheric Environment, 2006. 44: p. 2248–2259.

23. Adams, P.J. and J.H. Seinfeld, Predicting Global Aerosol Size Distributions in General Circulation Models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2002. 107: p. 4370.

Extended Abstract: File Not Uploaded
See more of this Session: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics - I
See more of this Group/Topical: Environmental Division