281056 QM and QM/MM Study On the Interaction of CO2 with CPL2

Tuesday, October 30, 2012
Hall B (Convention Center )
Paul Meza, chemical engineering, University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez Camous, MayagŁez, PR, Maria Curet-Arana, Chemical Engineering, University of Puerto Rico, MayagŁez, PR and Rafael A. Soler-Crespo, Chemical Engineering, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, PR

Metal-organic coordination networks (MOCNs) have high internal surface area, and the flexibility in their synthesis allows modifying the adsorptive properties of the pore very easily [1–6]. CPL2 (Cu2(pyrazine-2,3-dicarboxylate)2(4,4′-bipyridine)) is a MOCN that has a higher adsorption capacity for CO2 than for other light molecules, such as O2 and N2 [7]. The objective of this project is to study CO2 - CPL2 interactions using quantum mechanical (QM) calculations and ONIOM-EE, which is an integrated quantum mechanical molecular mechanical (QM/MM) method linked via electronic embedding. We have used two representative models for the CPL2 pore to reproduce binding sites in order to quantify energies of adsorption and to map possible adsorption mechanisms. For the QM calculations, we have compared two exchange/correlation functionals B3LYP and wB97XD, which has a specific treatment for Van der Waals forces. We have used a mix of 6-311G+ and LANL2DZ for the basis sets. The latter basis set was used solely on the transition metal atom.  For the ONIOM-EE calculations, we have used UFF to describe the low level part of the system. Our results demonstrate that there is an unpaired electron in the Cu atom. Electronic energies of reaction to form a CPL2 - CO2 complex range from -2 kJ/mol to -28 kJ/mol, and the distance between the CO2 and the closest atom of the framework is around of 2.7 Å, indicating  that there is a weak interaction on the CO2-CPL2 complex.

Reference

[1]       J.-R. Li et al., “Carbon dioxide capture-related gas adsorption and separation in metal-organic frameworks,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 255, no. 15–16, pp. 1791-1823, Aug. 2011.

[2]       R. J. Kuppler et al., “Potential applications of metal-organic frameworks,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 253, no. 23–24, pp. 3042-3066, Dec. 2009.

[3]       K. Biradha, A. Ramanan, and J. J. Vittal, “Coordination Polymers Versus Metal-Organic Frameworks,” Crystal Growth & Design, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 8-9, 2009.

[4]       S. Bureekaew, S. Shimomura, and S. Kitagawa, “Chemistry and application of flexible porous coordination polymers,” Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 014108, Apr. 2008.

[5]       J. L. C. Rowsell and O. M. Yaghi, “Metal–organic frameworks: a new class of porous materials,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 73, no. 1–2, pp. 3-14, Aug. 2004.

[6]       C. Janiak, “Engineering coordination polymers towards applications,” Dalton Transactions, no. 14, p. 2781, 2003.

[7]       O. J. García-Ricard and A. J. Hernández-Maldonado, “Cu2(pyrazine-2,3-dicarboxylate)2(4,4′-bipyridine) Porous Coordination Sorbents: Activation Temperature, Textural Properties, and CO2 Adsorption at Low Pressure Range,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 114, pp. 1827-1834, 2010.


Extended Abstract: File Not Uploaded