270424 Conductive Layers On Surface Modified Natural Fibre Based Substrates for Printed Functionality

Tuesday, October 30, 2012: 9:20 AM
304 (Convention Center )
Dimitar Valtakari1, Roger Bollström1, Mikko Tuominen2, Hannu Teisala2, Mikko Aromaa3, Martti Toivakka1, Jurkka Kuusipalo2, Jyrki M. Mäkelä3, Jun Uozumi4 and Jarkko J. Saarinen1,4, (1)Laboratory of Paper Coating and Converting, Center for Functional Materials, Abo Akademi University, Turku, Finland, (2)Paper Converting and Packaging Technology, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland, (3)Aerosol Physics Laboratory, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland, (4)Faculty of Engineering, Hokkai-Gakuen University, Sapporo, Japan


Formation of conductive surfaces by printing has been studied using an IGT flexographical test printer with PEDOT-PSS and silver conductive inks on coated papers. Printability of multilayer coated paper and TiO2 nanoparticle coating generated by the liquid flame spray process are compared to commercial plastic film used typically in printed electronics applications. The wettability of TiO2 nanoparticle coating can be altered between superhydrophobic and superhydrophilic states by ultraviolet light. It is observed that superhydrophobicity induced by TiO2nanoparticles results in poorer ink setting and hence lower conductivities with water-based PEDOT:PSS ink. Therefore, we observe conductivity only after several successive prints. On contrary, we observe several orders of magnitude better conductivities when using a silver ink in flexography. It is believed that sustainable natural fibre based substrates will find more applications in printed electronics application in the future.


Printed electronics and intelligence have been under a growing interest since the start of the 21stcentury with the market value forecasts up to 300 billion USD by 2025 [1].  Conventionally such applications have been produced on plastic films. However, paper based electronics has been studied recently [2], and it has been shown that simple, all-printed transistors can be made on multilayer coated paper [3]. Natural fibre based substrates are rapidly finding new applications outside of the conventional graphical arts industry.

Paper has many advantages over the plastic films: it is made of renewable materials and it is cheap with tailorable surface properties. Paper can be 1000 times cheaper than glass substrates and 100 times cheaper than plastic films [2]. Cellulose, the major component of plant biomass, is the most abundant biopolymer on Earth with annual production up to 1.8 × 1012 tonnes [4]. However, compared to plastic films, paper is porous, uneven, and rough network of fibres. Typically paper surface is smoothened by dispersion coating consisting mineral pigments and organic binders. Recently, nanoscale coating techniques including layer-by-layer and liquid flame spray coating have been studied that allow surface functionalization with significantly reduced coating amounts. Nanoscale control of surface properties is crucial for achieving good performance in electronics applications.

This study concentrates on printing large area conductive surfaces on various coated paper grades. Such conductive surfaces are needed, for example, in electrochromic displays and in photovoltaic (PV) cells. In current PV applications indium tin oxide (ITO) is typically used as a transparent conductive electrode. Unfortunately, there are two major drawbacks with ITO: first, it is expensive and scarce material. Secondly, the brittle nature of the ITO films makes them not suitable for flexible substrates. These limitations prevent the use of ITO on low-cost, large-scale PV applications. Conductive polymers such as poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT/PSS) may be suitable candidates as they can be both transparent and conductive. However, there is a strong correlation between conductivity and opacity i.e.the better the conductivity, the more opaque is the film. This has been a bottleneck but recent developments have eased the problem of achieving good transparency with high conductivity.

Our study concentrates on using flexographical printing with conductive inks on various coated paper grades to form large area conductive surfaces. We use two different natural fibre based substrates: a multilayer pigment coated grade and a nanoparticle coated paperboard in comparison to traditional plastic film. The paperboard surface is functionalized by TiO2nanoparticles using a liquid flame spray (LFS) coating process. In LFS process liquid precursor of titanium (IV) isopropoxide (TTIP) is fed into a high temperature and velocity flame in which the metal salt evaporates and nucleates to form nanoparticles of the metal oxide. These nanoparticles can be collected on a paperboard surface in on-line process flow and they cover the whole surface passing under the flame.

Materials and Methods

We use three different printing substrates in our study: a commercial poly(ethylene phthalate) (PET) film is used as the reference plastic film, a multilayer coated paper, and a double pigment coated paperboard. The multilayer coated paper contains a commercial finepaper that is coated by a barrier layer consisting of platy kaolin blended with ethylylene acrylic latex to prevent ink penetration into the substrate. To adjust printability, a topcoating layer consisting of fine platy kaolin and fine blocky kaolin blended with SB latex was coated on top of the barrier layer. The paper was further calendered three times through a softnip calender. The paperboard sample was coated by TiO2nanoparticles using a coating and lamination pilot line at the Tampere University of Technology (Tampere, Finland) with a 30 m/min web speed. The average diameter of the nanoparticles is between 40 and 80 nm.

Flexographical prints were carried out using a laboratory scale IGT GST 2 printability tester. PEDOT/PSS conductive polymer dispersed in water with viscosity of 100 - 350 mPas was tested at a print speed of 2 m/s. Solvent based silver ink with viscosity range of 2 000 – 3 000 mPas was tested at a print speed of 0.5 m/s. The contact angles of the inks were analyzed using a contact angle goniometer and the UV-exposure of the TiO2coated surfaces was carried out using a UV source with an UVA filter. Finally, a digital multimeter was used to characterize the conductivities between two hand-painted contacts of silver conductive paint.


The contact angles of water, PEDOT:PSS (solid content 1.0 – 1.4 %), and silver printing inks for flexography were measured. With TiO2nanoparticle coated samples we observed switching of superhydrophobic surface into superhydrophilic by UV light irradiation. Similar behavior was observed with water based PEDOT:PSS ink but no effect on solvent based silver ink was found.

The conductance values of PEDOT:PSS flexographical prints were measured after drying in an oven (1h, 120 °C). It was observed that plastic films require more successive print layers (here 4 layers) to obtain conductance due to poor wetting of smooth surface. The best performance was observed with a multilayer coated paper with controlled ink setting on the porous top layer. With TiO2nanoparticle coated samples we observed that surface wettability plays an important role when printing with water based flexographical inks. The conductivity values were lower when printing on superhydrophobic surface that is expected due to poorer wetting of the surface and formation of an uneven print layer.

Poor ink setting both on plastic film as well as on superhydrophobic LFS TiO2substrate was observed from the scanned images of the flexographical PEDOT:PSS prints that correlates well with the observed low conductivities. In multilayer coated structure the barrier layer below the thin and porous top coating layer prevents the ink penetration deep into the structure resulting in the lowest resistance values.

We have recently demonstrated UV sensor functionality on multilayer coated paper by using flexograhically printed silver electrodes with conductive polymers [5]. Here all the silver ink printed samples were sintered in an oven at 120°C for 60 min. We observe non-conducting layer with a single print. This is due to two factors: first, the amount of silver ink transferred from the anilox is too small in order to fill the whole surface. Secondly, the number of cells/cm in our anilox cylinder may be too small compared to the cell volume i.e.individual cells are visible in the final print. Hence, no conductivity is observed as there is no connecting path between the individual silver flakes below the threshold value. After the second and third successive prints we observed good conductivity (sheet resistance < 10 Ω/□) values as flakes become attached to each other. Similar behavior was observed in our earlier study [5] that related the surface coverage values to the observed conductivities


As a conclusion we have investigated possibilities to form large area conductive surfaces using a flexographical printing process with a laboratory scale test printer. Surface properties play a crucial role in the ink setting on the surface and in observed conductivity values. We have also shown that superhydrophobic surfaces result in poorer conductivity values with water based inks; to observe similar conductivity values as with hydrophilic surfaces several more print layers are required. Comparing the observed conductivities between paper substrates to commercial plastic film for PEDOT:PSS we can conclude that the porous paper surface provides a more uniform ink setting, and hence, improved conductivity values. Silver ink provides several orders of magnitude better conductivities but they cannot be used as the semi-transparent top electrode. Further work is needed to optimize the coating structure and ink formulation to achieve high conductivities.


This work has been funded by the Academy of Finland (grant no 250 122 & 256 263). JJS wishes to thank the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) for a research grant (L-11537).


[1] R. Das and P. Harrop, “Printed & organic electronics forecasts, players & opportunities 2008-2028,” IDTechEx report 7 (2008).

[2] D. Tobjörk and R. Österbacka,  Adv. Mater. 23, 1935 (2011).

[3] R. Bollström et al., Org. Electron. 10, 1020 (2009).

[4] D. E. Eveleigh, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 321, 435 (1987).

[5] J. J. Saarinen et al., Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 26, 133 (2011).

Extended Abstract: File Uploaded