Development of Moving Bed Simulation Model for Carbon Capture From Fossil Energy Systems

Wednesday, October 19, 2011
Exhibit Hall B (Minneapolis Convention Center)
Hosoo Kim, Computational Science Division, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Morgantown, WV and David C. Miller, U.S. Department Of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Morgantown, WV

The capture and separation of carbon dioxide (CO2) has been identified as a high-priority topic to cope with global climate change. Fossil fuels currently supply the most of the world’s energy needs, and their utilization is the major source of the anthropogenic CO2 emission [1]. Particularly, the existing coal-fired power plants annually emit about 2 billion tons of CO2 which is equivalent to two-thirds of the total emissions from U.S. power sector [2]. Therefore, it is critical to develop the cost-effective technologies to mitigate this problem. There are three options for capture for capturing CO2 from fossil energy system: post-combustion capture, pre-combustion capture, and oxy-combustion. Among them, post-combustion capture has the greatest near-term potential for reducing CO2 emission, because it can be applied to the existing coal-fired power plant with relative ease through a retrofit. The current commercially available solvent-based processes have advantages of fast kinetics and strong reactions, however only at a significant cost and efficiency penalty. Recently, various solid sorbents are being explored for one of promising CO2 capture technology, which are expected to reduce energy requirement and water usage with the approaches of fluidized or moving bed. However, solids are inherently more difficult to work with than liquids and no large scale system has yet been commercialized. In this study, we developed the rigorous 1-D PDE model for moving beds in Aspen Custom Modeler; the entire system consists of adsorbers, regenerators, and auxiliary equipments. The simulation result will be expected to compare with those of other post-combustion processes. We will deal with not only advantages of lower capital costs and power requirements but also problems associated with pressure drop and heat transfer.

[1] Figueroa JD, Fout T, Plasynski S, McIlvried H, Srivastava RD. Advances in CO2 capture technology--The U.S. Department of Energy’s Carbon Sequestration Program. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2008;2(1):9-20.

[2] Ciferno JP, Fout T,E Jones AP, Murphy JT. Capturing Carbon from Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants. Chemical Engineering Progress, 2009;April:33-41


Extended Abstract: File Not Uploaded
See more of this Session: Poster Session
See more of this Group/Topical: Computing and Systems Technology Division