Effect of Nanoscale Patterning in Surfactant-Coated Nanoparticles On Their Interfacial Properties: A Molecular Dynamics Study

Thursday, November 12, 2009: 9:15 AM
Governor's Chamber C (Gaylord Opryland Hotel)

Hao Jiang, Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Chetana Singh, Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Jeffrey J. Kuna, Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Kislon Voitchovsky, Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Francesco Stellacci, Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Sharon C. Glotzer, Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Experiments have shown that interfacial properties of substrates covered by mixed surfactant monolayers depend on the pattern formed by the adsorbed surfactants [1,2]. Interestingly, when a nanoparticle (NP) is coated with a mixture of hydrophilic and hydrophobic molecules in a striped pattern, the total work of adhesion of the NP varies non-monotonically with the hydrophilic stripe width [1]. The basis for this non-monotonic behavior is not clear. Here we present results from our systematic molecular dynamics study of interfacial properties of NPs covered with hydrophilic and hydrophobic ligands in aqueous solutions for a variety of surface patterns. Based on detailed statistical analysis of data from our simulations we infer that two competing effects viz. cavitation and enhanced hydrophilicity, lead to the non-monotonic behavior observed in experiments. With an increase in hydrophilic stripe-width accompanied by a decrease in the hydrophobic stripe-width, there is emergence of the cavitation effect [3] that leads to stress in the h-bond network of surrounding water and therefore decreases work of adhesion. However, an increase in hydrophilic stripe-width is also accompanied by an increase in h-bonding between water molecules and the hydrophilic ligands, and therefore leads to an increase in the work of adhesion. These two competing effects, both of which depend on stripe-width, combine in a complex way to result in the non-monotonic dependence of work of adhesion on stripe width. Finally, we provide a brief comparison between the experimental and simulational findings.

1. JJ Kuna, K Voïtchovsky, C Singh, PK Ghorai, H Jiang, S Mwenifumbo, MM Stevens, F Stellacci and SC Glotzer, “On the Role of Nanometer Scale Structure on Interfacial Energy”, submitted 2009.

2. A Centrone, E Penzo, M Sharma, JW Myerson, AM Jackson, N Marzari and F Stellacci, “The role of nanostructure in the wetting behavior of mixed-monolayer-protected metal nanoparticles”, PNAS, 9886, 105 (29), 2008.

3. D Chandler, “Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly”, Nature, 640, 437, 2005.

Extended Abstract: File Not Uploaded
See more of this Session: Modeling of Interfacial Systems I
See more of this Group/Topical: Engineering Sciences and Fundamentals